On May 21, 2014, Florida’s Second District Court of Appeals issued an opinion in Snell v. Mott’s Contracting Services, Inc. affecting construction claims of lien and arbitration proceedings. The court examined the question of whether the award of attorneys’ fees was proper in an arbitration proceeding pursuant to Florida’s Construction Lien Law.
The court held that Section Fla. Stat. § 713.21(1) requires that an “action to enforce a construction lien must be brought ‘in a court of competent jurisdiction’ within one year of recording the claim of lien or it automatically extinguishes.” Moreover, the Court held that an arbitration proceeding is not a “court.” As such, the lien at issue in this case “became unenforceable pursuant to section 713.22 prior to the issuance of the [arbitration] award” due to the contractor’s failure to file an enforcement action in court within a year.
Given the holding in Snell, it is likely advisable for lien holders to file an action in a court of competent jurisdiction within a year, even if the action is stayed during an arbitration proceeding. Otherwise, lienholders may have difficulty recovering fees or even enforcing a lien to the extent that enforcement in the arbitration proceeding is not complete within year.
W Mason is an associate with the law firm Fox Rothschild LLP. W practices in Fox Rothschild’s Litigation department in West Palm Beach, Florida. W focuses his practice on commercial litigation throughout Florida, with an emphasis on construction litigation. You can reach W at (561) 804-4432 or firstname.lastname@example.org. Below are some recent posts W has written on Florida Construction Lien Law:
- Florida Construction Liens: Lienor’s Notice to Contractor of Intent to be Protected by Bond.
- Florida Construction Liens: Payment Bonds
- Florida Construction Liens: Insurance Proceeds and Construction Liens
- Florida Construction Liens: Construction Liens on Condominium Properties
- Florida Construction Liens: Construction Liens on Leased Property